From Fidelity to Flexibility: Developing the Adaptive Fidelity Framework (AFF) for Pedagogical Innovations in Teacher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.8.3.2025.6931Keywords:
Adaptive Fidelity Framework, Teacher Education, Student-Centered Learning, Implementation Science, Teacher AgencyAbstract
This mixed-methods study explored the implementation of the Dynamic Learning Program (DLP), a student-centered pedagogy, in a Philippine private school, examining adherence, achievement, and stakeholder experiences. Through surveys, standardized tests, and interviews, the research revealed robust adherence but variable achievement, with stronger outcomes in literacy than STEM. Teachers’ adaptations, such as supplemental explanations, addressed conceptual challenges, highlighting the need for flexibility. These findings informed the Adaptive Fidelity Framework (AFF), a novel model balancing fidelity to core principles, teacher-led adaptation, and contextual moderators like resources and student readiness. The AFF redefines implementation science by prioritizing dynamic, context-responsive fidelity, offering a scalable approach for teacher education and policy in low- and middle-income countries and beyond. The study underscores the importance of teacher agency in navigating fidelity-adaptation tensions, contributing to global discourses on equitable, sustainable reform. Implications include training teachers as adaptive implementers and designing monitoring systems that value contextual responsiveness. This Philippine case provides a blueprint for scaling innovations worldwide, advancing efforts to balance educational quality with equity.
Downloads
References
Andrews, T. C., Conaway, E. P., Zhao, J., & Dolan, E. L. (2019). Colleagues as change agents: How department networks and opinion leaders influence teaching at a single research university. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(1), ar7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-01-0010
Angrist, N., Bergman, P., Evans, D. K., Hares, S., Jukes, M. C. H., & Letsomo, T. (2023). Practical lessons for phone-based assessments of learning. NBER Working Paper No. 31145. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31145
Asterhan, C. S. C., Elmelik, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2024). Pedagogical implications of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI): Opportunities, challenges, and directions. Prospects, 54, 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-024-09798-5
Baird, M. D., & Pane, J. F. (2019). Translating personalized learning into policy: Lessons from RAND’s work on personalized learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719834133
Bailey, D. H., Duncan, G. J., Murnane, R. J., & Au Yeung, N. (2020). Achievement gaps in the era of No Child Left Behind. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620919463
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bremner, N., Goss, H., Besa, K., & Rincón-Gallardo, S. (2022). From scaling up reforms to scaling across learning ecologies: A multi-country study of mathematics education. International Journal of Educational Development, 92, 102649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102649
Cherastidtham, I., Sonnemann, J., & Hunter, A. (2017). Grattan Institute report: Grattan school education program. Grattan Institute. https://doi.org/10.26190/5c7x-8a50
Driessen, E., de Bruin, A., & van Merriënboer, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and self-regulated learning: An overview of recent developments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(3), ar41. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-04-0068
Education Endowment Foundation. (2021). Remote learning: Rapid evidence assessment. Education Endowment Foundation. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4442930
Escueta, M., Quan, V., Nickow, A. J., & Oreopoulos, P. (2020). Education technology: An evidence-based review. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.147
Hennessy, S., Haßler, B., & Hofmann, R. (2022). Sustaining pedagogical innovation in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from teacher professional development. Frontiers in Education, 7, 889764. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.889764
Hill, H. C. (2019). The changing landscape of teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 48(6), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19891436
Huber, S. G., & Helm, C. (2020). COVID-19 and schooling: Evaluation, assessment, and accountability in times of crises—Reacting quickly to explore key issues for policy, practice, and research with the school barometer. European Educational Research Journal, 19(6), 692–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904120965415
Jolles, M. P., Fort, M. P., & Glasgow, R. E. (2024). Moving implementation science forward in global health: The role of policy, context, and equity. International Journal for Equity in Health, 23, 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02130-6
Kafyulilo, A., Mwakapenda, W., & Ramnarain, U. (2023). Professional development for science teachers in sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons from a multi-country initiative. Teaching and Teacher Education, 126, 104012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104012
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 154, 103923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103923
Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting the evidence on “learning loss.” EdResearch for Recovery. https://doi.org/10.26300/76sc-aq33
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
Li, H., Ma, Q., & Zhu, M. (2023). AI-supported adaptive learning in mathematics: Impacts on learning outcomes and equity. Computers & Education, 205, 104745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104745
Lynch, K., Hill, H. C., Gonzalez, K. E., & Pollard, C. (2019). Strengthening teacher education: What works and what doesn’t. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 260–293. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719849044
Macnamara, B. N., & Burgoyne, A. P. (2023). Do learning strategies generalize across tasks? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 149(3–4), 133–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000352
Nolen, A. L., Ward, C., & Wilson, K. (2022). Scaling evidence-based practices: Balancing fidelity and adaptation. Policy & Politics, 50(3), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16105504140135
OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning worldwide. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8f6f09d5-en
OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 results (Volume II): Learning during—and from—disruption. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b9d9f0d0-en
OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Parental and peer influences. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1e3d3b70-en
Penuel, W. R., Allen, A. R., Coburn, C. E., & Farrell, C. (2017). Conceptualizing research–practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. AERA Open, 3(4), 2332858417736323. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417736323
Reich, J., Buttimer, C. J., Fang, A., Hillaire, G., Hirsch, K., Larke, L. R., & Slama, R. (2020). Remote learning guidance from state education agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: A first look. AERA Open, 6(4), 2332858420972198. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420972198
Sayer, A., Evans, D., & Lomer, S. (2024). Policy borrowing and the politics of evidence in global education reforms. Policy & Politics, 52(3), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557323X16826824549746
Shniffer, A., Resh, N., & BenDavid-Hadar, I. (2023). Between fidelity and flexibility: How schools mediate policy reforms. Policy & Politics, 51(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16657513052322
Sims, S., & Fletcher-Wood, H. (2021). Characteristics of effective teacher professional development: What we know, what we don’t, and what we need to know. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(2), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1772841
Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704
Snilstveit, B., Stevenson, J., Menon, R., & Phillips, D. (2019). The impact of education programmes on learning and school participation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and evidence gap map. 3ie. https://doi.org/10.23846/EGM014
Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., … Young, A. M. (2017). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(1), ar3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0120
Tlili, A., Huang, R., Shehata, B., Liu, D., Zhao, J., Metwally, A. H. S., … Chang, T.-W. (2023). Generative AI in education: Applications, opportunities, and challenges. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00435-4
Tolmatcheff, C., Graczyk, P. A., Blase, K., & Fixsen, D. (2023). Implementation fidelity and adaptation in education: A systematic review. Prevention Science, 24, 1790–1804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-023-01580-8
Xie, K., Hensley, L. C., Law, V., & Sun, Z. (2019). Self-regulation across learning contexts: Examining the relationships among self-regulation, online learning, and student outcomes. Computers & Education, 140, 103621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103621
Zalavra, E., & Makris, I. (2021). Active learning in STEM higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00311-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Leah Paola Estacio, Ronald Quileste, Kathleen Morales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with JSGP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
