A Discourse Analysis Of Students-Teacher Pattern Interaction In Elt Classroom
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v9i1.2209
Keywords:
Discourse analysis, student-teacher pattern, English Language Teaching, ELT ClassroomAbstract
This study aims to find patterns of interaction between students and teachers in ELT classes. Participants involved in this study were 32 students and one English teacher. This research is a qualitative research with a descriptive design. This relates to the use of language in a social context, namely interaction or dialogue between students and teachers. The author uses 2 types of instruments, namely observation using the blue print protocol and also recording all English learning activities in the ninth grade of SMP N Toboali. Then after making observations and obtaining all the required data, the authors conducted an analysis using FIAS (Flanders Interaction System Analysis) which consisted of 3 parts, namely the teacher's indirect influence, the teacher's direct influence and students' speech responses. The teacher's indirect influence consists of 3 kinds of interactions such as receiving feelings, praising encouragement, accepting or using student ideas, and asking questions. Then, the teacher's direct influence consists of lecturing or explaining, giving directions, and criticizing or justifying authority. The last is the student's response which consists of the student's speech response, student initiation, and silence. According to the research results, there are four types of classroom interaction research: content traffic, teacher control, teacher support, and student participation. Based on the results of the data found, it shows that the dominant pattern used in this study is student participation, with a total of 54 or 45% of utterances. Hence, it can be concluded that the students of ninth grade students at SMPN 3 Toboali were active during the teaching and learning process in class.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Adi, M. S., Susanti, R. A., & Jannah, Q. (2021). The effectiveness of ice breaking to increase students’ motivation in learning English. International Journal of English Education and Linguistics (IJoEEL), 3(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v3i1.2256
Basuki, R. (2015). Kesantunan berbahasa dalam wacana interaksi komunikasi di lingkungan Universitas Bengkulu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra., Volume 14,.
Bestiara, B., Arifmiboy, A., & Lismay, L. (2021). The students’ perception on teachers’ basic teaching skills in english classroom. ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy), 6(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v6i2.392
Chairunnisa. (2020). Discourse analysis of teacher talks during English classes at senior high school Methodist Banda Aceh. English Education Journal, 11(1), 34–57.
Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Third). SAGE Publication.
Darma, Y. A. (2014). Analisis wacana krisis dalam multiperspektif. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Dewi, W. P. (2021). Strategi pemberian reward dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran akidah akhlak di MTs Negeri 1 Ponorogo pada masa pandemi COVID-19. IAIN Ponorogo.
Erawan, D. G. B., & Wedasuwari, I. A. M. (2021). Analisis wacana kritis dalam wacana interaksi kelas. Bina Patria, 15(6), 4589–4596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33758/mbi.v15i6.898
Eriyanto. (2005). Analisis wacana: Pengantar analisis teks media. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Kajian Islam dan Studi (LKiS).
Erlia, W. (2021). Roles of the teacher for increasing learning quality of students. ETUDE: Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.56724/etude.v1i3.35
Farmida, S., Ediwarman, E., & Tisnasari, S. (2021). Analysis of satire and sarcasm in the 2019 presidential debate and its implementation in high school learning. Indonesian Ark. Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature, Research.
Febriyani, A. R., & Haerudin, D. (2020). Motivation of a slow learner in an elementary school. ETUDE: Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.56724/etude.v1i1.26
Juniarmi, V. C. (2019). A study of classroom interaction pattern at elementary schools’ English class. Sanata Dharma University.
Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive analysis in education: A guide for researchers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
Mentari, R. S. (2021). An analysis of classroom interaction in English foreign language (EFL) classroom at the 11th grade of SMAN 1 Bengkulu Tengah. IAIN Bengkulu.
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London, UK: Routledge.
Naimat, G. K. (2011). Influence of teacher-students interaction on EFL reading comprehension. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(4), 672–687.
Novianti, D. (2022). Class interaction analysis in English learning based on flanders interaction analysis category system (FIACS). Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Özüdoğru, M. (2020). The use of a student response system in teacher training classrooms and its effect on classroom environment. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 13(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.13.1.4
Putri, F. G. (2014). An analysis of classroom interaction by using flander interaction analysis categories system (FIACS) technique at SMPN 13 Kota Bengkulu in 2013/ 2014 academic year. Universitas Bengkulu.
Putri, K. I., & Putri, H. P. (2021). The analysis of classroom interaction in English class using foreign language interaction. Modality Journal: International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 1(2), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.30983/mj.v1i2.5117
Raharja, B. J., & Ghozali, I. (2020). Discourse analysis on teacher-students interaction pattern of English teaching learning process. Journal of Applied Linguistics, Translation, and Literature, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33292/jalintrali.v1i1.53
Rivers, W. M. (1987). Interactive language teaching: Interaction as the key to teaching language for communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Saptani, P. (2015). Tindak tutur dalam wacana kelas VB SD Negeri 62 Kota Bengkulu tahun pelajaran 2012/2013. Diksa: Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33369/diksa.v1i2.3145
Sari, S. K., Ghazali, A. S., & Widiati, N. (2017). Penggunaan negosiasi makna dalam wacana lisan guru dan pengaruhnya terhadap pemahaman siswa kelas IV sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(3), 424–433. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i3.8717
Septiningtyas, M. (2016). A study of interaction in teaching English to teaching elementary school students (TEYL) classroom using flanders. Sanata Dharma University.
Septy, A. R. (2021). An analysis of teacher-students interaction in online classroom by using flander interaction analysis category system (Fiacs) techniques. (1611040320).
Setiananingrum, D., & Saleh, M. (2016). Classroom interaction patterns in higher education. English Education Journal, 6(2), 10–16.
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Tarigan, H. G. (2009). Pengajaran wacana. Bandung: Angkasa.
Thapa, C. B., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2013). Interaction in English language classrooms to enhance students’ language learning. Retrieved January 7, 2023, from Nelta Choutari website: https://neltachoutari.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/interaction-in-english-language-classrooms-to-enhance-nepalese-students-language-learning/
Theobald, M. A. (2005). Increasing student motivation: Strategies for middle and high school teachers. Cape Girardeau: Corwin.
Wibowo, L. (2016). Classroom interaction in an EYL classroom. English Department Graduate School Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya.
Basuki, R. (2015). Kesantunan berbahasa dalam wacana interaksi komunikasi di lingkungan Universitas Bengkulu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra., Volume 14,.
Bestiara, B., Arifmiboy, A., & Lismay, L. (2021). The students’ perception on teachers’ basic teaching skills in english classroom. ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy), 6(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v6i2.392
Chairunnisa. (2020). Discourse analysis of teacher talks during English classes at senior high school Methodist Banda Aceh. English Education Journal, 11(1), 34–57.
Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Third). SAGE Publication.
Darma, Y. A. (2014). Analisis wacana krisis dalam multiperspektif. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Dewi, W. P. (2021). Strategi pemberian reward dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran akidah akhlak di MTs Negeri 1 Ponorogo pada masa pandemi COVID-19. IAIN Ponorogo.
Erawan, D. G. B., & Wedasuwari, I. A. M. (2021). Analisis wacana kritis dalam wacana interaksi kelas. Bina Patria, 15(6), 4589–4596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33758/mbi.v15i6.898
Eriyanto. (2005). Analisis wacana: Pengantar analisis teks media. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Kajian Islam dan Studi (LKiS).
Erlia, W. (2021). Roles of the teacher for increasing learning quality of students. ETUDE: Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.56724/etude.v1i3.35
Farmida, S., Ediwarman, E., & Tisnasari, S. (2021). Analysis of satire and sarcasm in the 2019 presidential debate and its implementation in high school learning. Indonesian Ark. Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature, Research.
Febriyani, A. R., & Haerudin, D. (2020). Motivation of a slow learner in an elementary school. ETUDE: Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.56724/etude.v1i1.26
Juniarmi, V. C. (2019). A study of classroom interaction pattern at elementary schools’ English class. Sanata Dharma University.
Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive analysis in education: A guide for researchers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
Mentari, R. S. (2021). An analysis of classroom interaction in English foreign language (EFL) classroom at the 11th grade of SMAN 1 Bengkulu Tengah. IAIN Bengkulu.
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London, UK: Routledge.
Naimat, G. K. (2011). Influence of teacher-students interaction on EFL reading comprehension. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(4), 672–687.
Novianti, D. (2022). Class interaction analysis in English learning based on flanders interaction analysis category system (FIACS). Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Özüdoğru, M. (2020). The use of a student response system in teacher training classrooms and its effect on classroom environment. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 13(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.13.1.4
Putri, F. G. (2014). An analysis of classroom interaction by using flander interaction analysis categories system (FIACS) technique at SMPN 13 Kota Bengkulu in 2013/ 2014 academic year. Universitas Bengkulu.
Putri, K. I., & Putri, H. P. (2021). The analysis of classroom interaction in English class using foreign language interaction. Modality Journal: International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 1(2), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.30983/mj.v1i2.5117
Raharja, B. J., & Ghozali, I. (2020). Discourse analysis on teacher-students interaction pattern of English teaching learning process. Journal of Applied Linguistics, Translation, and Literature, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33292/jalintrali.v1i1.53
Rivers, W. M. (1987). Interactive language teaching: Interaction as the key to teaching language for communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Saptani, P. (2015). Tindak tutur dalam wacana kelas VB SD Negeri 62 Kota Bengkulu tahun pelajaran 2012/2013. Diksa: Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33369/diksa.v1i2.3145
Sari, S. K., Ghazali, A. S., & Widiati, N. (2017). Penggunaan negosiasi makna dalam wacana lisan guru dan pengaruhnya terhadap pemahaman siswa kelas IV sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(3), 424–433. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i3.8717
Septiningtyas, M. (2016). A study of interaction in teaching English to teaching elementary school students (TEYL) classroom using flanders. Sanata Dharma University.
Septy, A. R. (2021). An analysis of teacher-students interaction in online classroom by using flander interaction analysis category system (Fiacs) techniques. (1611040320).
Setiananingrum, D., & Saleh, M. (2016). Classroom interaction patterns in higher education. English Education Journal, 6(2), 10–16.
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Tarigan, H. G. (2009). Pengajaran wacana. Bandung: Angkasa.
Thapa, C. B., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2013). Interaction in English language classrooms to enhance students’ language learning. Retrieved January 7, 2023, from Nelta Choutari website: https://neltachoutari.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/interaction-in-english-language-classrooms-to-enhance-nepalese-students-language-learning/
Theobald, M. A. (2005). Increasing student motivation: Strategies for middle and high school teachers. Cape Girardeau: Corwin.
Wibowo, L. (2016). Classroom interaction in an EYL classroom. English Department Graduate School Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya.
Downloads
Published
2023-05-03
How to Cite
Rhamadina, W., Alek, A., Husna, N., & Hidayat, D. N. (2023). A Discourse Analysis Of Students-Teacher Pattern Interaction In Elt Classroom. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 9(1), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v9i1.2209
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
