Aceh as The Role Model of Democratic Management Success: Critical Discourses Analysis
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i1.5059
Keywords:
Aceh, Political Success, Critical Discourse Analysis, Van DijkAbstract
This study analyzes the news narrative “Aceh Tak Masuk Daerah Rawan Pilkada Serentak, Lima Provinsi Memiliki Potensi Tinggi” using Van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) model to explore Aceh’s portrayal as a role model of democratic success. The research aims to uncover how this narrative influences perceptions of Aceh’s stability among local and national audiences, particularly in contrast to its historical association with conflict. This study adopts a qualitative approach, employing Van Dijk’s CDA framework, which consists of three dimensions: textual analysis, social cognition, and sociopolitical context. The data were collected through a textual analysis of media discourse and audience surveys involving 47 respondents (37 from Aceh and 10 from outside Aceh). The textual analysis focuses on the structural composition of the news, while the audience survey examines how different groups perceive the narrative. The results indicate that 72.73% of local respondents express pride in Aceh’s depiction as a safe and stable region, yet 43.24% remain neutral about its relevance to current realities. Among national respondents, 100% perceive the narrative positively, with 50% strongly agreeing that Aceh serves as a model for democratic management. These findings demonstrate that media discourse effectively challenges stereotypes and promotes a positive image of Aceh, particularly to national audiences. However, local acceptance requires narratives grounded in authentic experiences. This study contributes to discourse analysis by showing how positive discourse can transform public perception, highlighting its potential to promote post-conflict regions as examples of democratic success.
Downloads
References
Ajis, A. A. (2019). Strategi Kebijakan Menjaga Warisan Budaya Bandar Aceh Darussalam Di Kota Banda Aceh, Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Konservasi Cagar Budaya, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.33374/jurnalkonservasicagarbudaya.v13i2.204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33374/jurnalkonservasicagarbudaya.v13i2.204
Akbar, M., & Lbs, H. (2022). Analisis Wacana Kritis Berita Pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara Pada Youtube TvOne. Integralistik, 33(2), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.15294/integralistik.v33i2.35802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/integralistik.v33i2.35802
Ángel-Osorio, J., Nieto-Gómez, L. E., & Giraldo-Díaz, R. (2021). Political participation of the opposition in Colombia after the 2016 Peace Agreement. Entramado, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.7484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.7484
Aspinall, E. (2009). Islam and Nation: Separatist Rebellion in Aceh. In Islam and Nation (1st ed.). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804776271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804776271
Bassett, D. K., & Reid, A. (1989). Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450-1680. Volume One: The Lands Below the Winds. Pacific Affairs, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2760299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2760299
Damien Kingsbury. (2006). Peace in Aceh : a personal account of the Helsinki peace process (1st ed., Vol. 1). Equinox Publishing.
Diamond, L. (1994). Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0041
Ericson, J. E., & Dahl, R. A. (1972). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. American Quarterly, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2711442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2711442
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis the critical study of language, second edition. In Critical Discourse Analysis The Critical Study of Language, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Feener, R. M. (2013). Social Engineering Through Shari’a: Islamic Law And State-Directed Da’wa In Contemporary Aceh. Indonesia Law Review, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v3n3.42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v3n3.42
Galtung, J. (2012). Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. In Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221631
Hofer, K., Wicki, M., & Kaufmann, D. (2024). Public support for participation in local development. World Development, 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106569
Islamiyah, H. Y., & Hermaliza, H. (2024). Teun A Van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis On Kompas.Com News. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 8(1), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v8i1.9280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v8i1.9280
Julaeha, et al. (2021). Analisis Wacana Kritis Model “Teun A Van Dijk” Terhadap Teks Wacana Berita Daring CNN Indonesia. Caraka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Serta Bahasa Daerah, 10(3).
Mac Ginty, R. (2022). The Unintended Consequences of Peace: Peaceful Borders and Illicit Transnational Flows. By Arie Marcelo Kacowicz, Exequiel Lacovsky, Keren Sasson, and Daniel F. Wajner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 320p. $99.99 cloth. Perspectives on Politics, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592721004059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721004059
Morrison, K. C., Lederach, J. P., Magyar, K., & Conteh-Morgan, E. (1999). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. African Studies Review, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/525381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/525381
Muhzinat, Z. (2021). Perekonomian Kerajaan Aceh Darussalam Era Sultan Iskandar Muda. Tsaqofah Dan Tarikh: Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Sejarah Islam, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.29300/ttjksi.v5i2.3719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29300/ttjksi.v5i2.3719
O’Donnell, G. (2010). Democracy, Agency, and the State: Theory with Comparative Intent. In Democracy, Agency, and the State: Theory with Comparative Intent. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587612.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587612.001.0001
Rahman, A., Wasino, Suyahmo, Arsal, T., & Shintasiwi, F. A. (2022). Local wisdom and strengthening social integration in multiethnic society post-aceh conflict. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.3.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.3.06
Sahlan, M., Fajarni, S., Ikramatoun, S., Kamil, A. I., & Ilham, I. (2019). The Roles of Ulama in the process of Post-Conflict Reconciliation in Aceh. Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v7i2.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v7i2.106
Sari, E., Rahman, A., Syah, A., & Mansari, M. (2022). The Political Changes of Ulama In The Aceh Government System. Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Law, Legal Studies and Social Science (MICoLLS), 2. https://doi.org/10.29103/micolls.v2i.120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/micolls.v2i.120
Snouck Hurgronye. (1985). Aceh Dimata Kolonialis (1st ed., Vol. 1). Yayasan Soko Guru.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908
Van Dijk, T. A. (2019). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. In Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429025532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429025532
van Klinken, G. (2017). The Cultural Dimension of Peace. Decentralization and Reconciliation in Indonesia, written by Birgit Bräuchler. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 173(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17302010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17302010
Yanti, N. P. D. E., Putrayasa, I. B., & Artika, I. W. (2019). Analisis Wacana Kritis Teun A. Van Dijk Pada Teks Pidato Klaim Kemenangan Pilpres 2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v3i3.21846
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.