Guru IPA dan Calon Guru IPA Menghadapi Soal-Soal Berkarakter PISA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.3.1.2020.237Keywords:
Guru IPA, Calon Guru IPA, PISAAbstract
Indonesia adalah salah satu negara non anggota Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) yang mengikuti Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) untuk mendapatkan gambaran posisi relatif tingkat literasi peserta didik dalam kisaran usia 15 tahun di dunia internasional. Dalam kategori sains, peringkat Indonesia pada hasil PISA yang terakhir dirilis (tahun 2018) masih berada di lingkup 10 terbawah. Hal tersebut menguatkan dugaan masih adanya kesenjangan antara proses dan evaluasi pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) dengan kerangka asesmen literasi yang digunakan dalam PISA. Salah satu aspek yang harus menjadi bahan kajian terkait dugaan tersebut adalah pengenalan dan penguasaan para guru IPA terhadap soal-soal yang digunakan dalam PISA. Dalam makalah ini disajikan hasil yang diperoleh oleh mahasiswa calon guru IPA dan guru-guru IPA SMP dengan rata-rata pengalaman mengajar 13 tahun 11 bulan ketika menghadapi 20 soal pilihan ganda yang disadur dari atau mengadaptasi soal-soal sains PISA. Pembahasan dan rekomendasi terkait hasil tersebut juga diajukan dalam makalah ini.
Downloads
References
Allchin, D. (2014). From science studies to scientific literacy: A view from the classroom, Science and Education, 23(9), 1911-1932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9672-8
Avvisati, F. (2018). How are school performance and school climate related to teachers’ experience?, PISA in Focus 88/September, OECD Publishing:Paris.
Baharuddin, Muhammad Rusli, A. Fitriani, and Jumarniati Jumarniati. "EFEKTIVITAS PENDEKATAN PROBLEM POSING SETTING KOOPERATIF TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIS." Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 2.2 (2017).
Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., Swanger, L. P., Staus, N., Back, M., Barriault, C.,... Verheyden, P. (2016). Correlating science center use with adult science literacy: An international, cross-institutional study. Science Education, 100(5), 849–876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21225
Fitriani, F., Baharuddin, M. R., & Kayanti, J. (2019). Comparison of Cooperative Learning Model Think Pair Share and Think Pair Square Toward Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability. International Conference on Natural and Social Sciences (ICONSS) Proceeding Series, 1(1), 202-208.
Guzzetti, B.J., Bang, E. (2010). The Influence of Literacy-Based Science Instruction on Adolescents' Interest, Participation, and Achievement in Science, Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(1), 44-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070903447774
Heller, J.I., Daehler, K.R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M. & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21004
Iskandar, D. & Senam. (2015). Studi kemampuan guru Kimia lulusan UNY dalam mengembangkan soal UAS berbasis HOTS, Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(1), 65-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i1.4533
Kazempour, M. & Amirshokoohi, A. (2014). Transitioning to inquiry-based teaching: exploring science teachers’ professional development experiences, International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9, 285-309.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Materi Pelatihan Guru Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 SMP/MTs IPA.
Kini, T. & Podolsky, A. (2016). Does Teaching Experience Increase Teacher Effectiveness? A Review of the Research. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54300/625.642
Meroni, E. C., Vera-Toscano, E., & Costa, P. (2015). Can low skills teachers make good students? Empirical evidence from PIAAC and PISA, Journal of Policy and Modelling, 37, 308-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.02.006
Organisation for Economics Co-operation and Development. (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, ed.,Paris:OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economics Co-operation and Development. (2016). Country Note Results from PISA: Indonesia, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pisanu, F., Fraccaroli, F., & Gentile, M. (2014). Training Transfer in Teachers Training Program: A Longitudinal Case Study, K. Schneider (ed.), Transfer of Learning in Organizations, 99-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02093-8_7
Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A.M., Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110 – 116.
Ryder, J., dan Banner, I. (2013). School Teachers’ Experiences of Science Curriculum Reform, International Journal of Science Education, 35(3), 490-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.665195
Sari, Y., Cahyaningtyas, A.P., Maharani, M.M., Yustiana, S., & Kusumadewi, R.F. (2019). Meningkatkan kemampuan menyusun soal IPA berorientasi HOTS bagi guru Sekolah Dasar Gugus Pandanaran Dabin IV UPTD Semarang Tengah, Indonesian Journal of Community Services, 1(2), 175-183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.30659/ijocs.1.2.175-183
Scully, D. (2017). Constructing Multiple-Choice Items to Measure Higher-Order Thinking, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 22(4).
Sudibyo, E., Qosyim, N., & Sabtiawan, W.B. (2020). Pendampingan pengembangan instrumen penilaian berstandar nasional bagi guru IPA SMP kabupaten Kediri, Jurnal Abdi, 5(2), 127-133.
Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A.M., & Osman, K. (2012) Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110 – 116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
Wilson, S. M. (2013, 19 April). Professional Development for Science Teachers, Science, 340, 310-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230725
Woods-McConney, A., Oliver, M.C., McConney, Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2013). Science engagement and literacy: A retrospective analysis for students in Canada and Australia, International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1588-1608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.871658
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with JSGP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
