Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Guru pada Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas

Authors

  • Vanya Aridanthy Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Al Jupri Al Jupri Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.7.1.2024.3878

Keywords:

TPACK, Pembelajaran Matematika, Guru, Siswa, SMA

Abstract

The rapid development of technology and science in the 21st century requires individuals to adapt to emerging challenges. As a result, individuals must have 21st century skills to be able to deal with various problems and difficulties that arise. However, in Indonesia, the application of mathematics learning approaches and models is still largely dominated by a scientific approach combined with direct teaching, even though the government through the Ministry of Education has instructed to implement learning models that are constructive, interesting and innovative, such as discovery learning, problem-based learning, and project-based learning. To implement interesting and innovative learning in trigonometry material, knowledge of technology, pedagogy and content (TPACK) is one of the important factors that teachers must master. The purpose of this article is to report the use of a technology-based learning approach to develop mathematics teachers' TPACK competencies and the transformation of their knowledge in integrating technology into mathematics teaching practices. The research method used is descriptive qualitative to explain the concepts of TPACK analysis in learning. The results of this study illustrate that TPACK competencies can be specifically considered a core attribute for future mathematics teachers, because learning models using technological tools can help students develop mathematical understanding and influence the practice of mathematics teaching methods for teachers. In addition, mathematics teachers' TPACK competencies can have a direct impact on student learning in mathematics lessons. This shows that a technology-based learning approach can play an effective role in preparing and improving TPACK competencies for mathematics teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alenezi, A. (2023). Using project-based learning through the madrasati platform for mathematics teaching in secondary schools. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.332372

Ampadu, E., & Danso, A. (2018). Constructivism in mathematics classrooms: Listening to Ghanaian teachers’ and students’ views. Africa Education Review, 15(3), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1340808

Armiyati, L., & Fachrurozi, M. H. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) calon guru di Tasikmalaya. JIPSINDO (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Indonesia), 9(2), 164-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipsindo.v9i2.52050

Asomah, R. K., Agyei, D. D., Ntow, F. D., & Benning, I. (2023). Hypothetical approach to the teaching of trigonometric concepts using cooperative learning. Education Research International, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2051776

Chau Nguyen, G. T., & Hai Pham, C. T. (2023). An empirical study of factors influencing primary school teachers’ long-term commitment to Realistic Mathematics Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 1–18. Education. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.V14I1.PP1-18

Fatah, A., Suryadi, D., Sabandar, J., & Turmudi. (2016). Open-ended approach: An effort in cultivating students’ mathematical creative thingking ability and self-esteem in mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2813.9-18

Goos, M., Carreira, S., & Namukasa, I. K. (2023). Mathematics and interdisciplinary STEM education: recent developments and future directions. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1199–1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01533-z

Hasse, C. (2017). Technological literacy for teachers. Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1305057

Ilyas, M., Meiyani, E., Ma’rufi, M., & Kaewhanam, P. (2022). Improving students’ ability in learning mathematics by using the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Frontiers in Education, 7(October), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.966687

In’am, A., & Hajar, S. (2017). Learning geometry through discovery learning using a scientific approach. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 55 70. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1014a

Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., Cheo, M., & Baumert, J. (2015). Content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in Taiwanese and German mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.004

Melaibari, S. O. M., & Ismail, N. (2023). The effect of realistic mathematics education on undergraduate freshmen students’ mathematical competencies. Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, 17(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/170108

Rahayu, D. V., Muhtadi, D., & Ridwan, I. M. (2022). Pedagogical content knowledge guru dalam pembelajaran matematika daring. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i2.720

Rakes, C. R., Wesneski, A., & Laws, R. (2023). Building mathematics learning through inquiry using student-generated data: Lessons learned from plan-do study-act cycles. Education Sciences, 13(9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090919

Siswono, T. Y. E., Hartono, S., & Kohar, A. W. (2020). Deductive or inductive? prospective teachers’ preference of proof method on an intermediate proof task. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.11846.417-438

Susilawati, W., Widiastuti, T., & Abdullah, R. (2022). Pelatihan desain technological pedagogical, content knowledge pembelajaran matematis menuju pendidik profesional. Wikrama Parahita: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 6(1), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.30656/jpmwp.v6i1.3804

Thompson, P. W. (2020). Constructivism in mathematics education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 14(1983), 127–134.

Wahyuni, F. T. (2019). Hubungan antara Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) dengan Technology Integration Self Efficacy (TISE) Guru Matematika di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Kudus), 2(2), 109-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/jpm.v2i2.6358

Wang, G., Kang, Y., Li, F., Zhen, Y., Chen, X., & Huang, H. (2022). An evidence-based study on the current status of Chinese secondary school mathematics teachers’ autonomous learning capacity across demographic and contextual factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(October), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042838

Yeung, W. L., & Ng, O. L. (2023). Characterizing touchscreen actions in technology enhanced embodied learning for mathematics instruction in K-12 setting – A systematic review (2010–2023). Computers and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104881

Yurinda, B., & Widyasari, N. (2022). Analisis technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) guru profesional dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 8(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.8.1.47-60

Zaeni, A., Rahayu, W., & Makmuri, M. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen self assessment technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) calon guru matematika berbasis hots. Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 6(1), 59-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v6i1.4960

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

Aridanthy, V., & Al Jupri, A. J. (2024). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Guru pada Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.7.1.2024.3878

Issue

Section

Regular Articles