Citra Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi di Perguruan Tinggi; Kendala dan Mutu Pembelajaran Online
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i1.5451
Keywords:
belajar online, persepsi mahasiswa, teknologi pembelajaranAbstract
Perkembangan teknologi dan ilmu pengetahuan memberi kemudahan dalam menyelesaikan pekerjaan termasuk bidang pendidikan. Dalam era Revolusi Industri 4.0 penggunaan teknologi pada aspek pendidikan menggeser praktik pembelajaran konvensional ke berbasis teknologi. Platform online yang digunakan membuat pembelajaran lebih mudah dan fleksibel sambil dipersepsikan memiliki kendala dan penurunan mutu proses. Penelitian ini mengkonfirmasi temuan sebelumnya yang mencitrakan permasalahan dalam pembelajaran on line berlaku relatif sama pada semua kelompok sasaran penelitian tanpa mempertimbangkan stratifikasi dan klaster pengguna. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mendeskripsikan citra pembelajaran dengan teknologi dalam pembelajaran online, mutu komunikasi timbal balik dosen-mahasiswa, kedisiplinan, dan aktivitas individu dalam belajar. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh mahasiswa perguruan tinggi negeri dan swasta di ibu kota Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan dan Sulawesi Barat, Indonesia. Sampel terdiri dari 255 mahasiswa yang dipilih secara acak. Data dikumpulkan dengan angket dan dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian mengungkap bahwa mahasiswa mempersepsi adanya kendala namun tidak signifikan saat pembelajaran. Mutu komunikasi timbal balik dosen-mahasiswa maupun antarmahasiswa relatif sama dengan saat pembelajaran tatap muka, belajar individual mahasiswa juga demikian, kedisiplinan menurun dibandingkan saat pembelajaran tatap muka. Perlu penanaman sikap positif dan kontrol perilaku mahasiswa agar pelaksanaan pembelajaran Online menjadi lebih optimal.
Downloads
References
Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), e05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
Alkalash, S. H., Alabdali, J. A., Aldabli, A. O., Alnashri, Z. A., Almqaadi, A. K., Alabdali, A. H., & Hamza, S. M. (2022). Perceptions of distance learning among Al-Qunfudhah medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 17(3), 516–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.04.003
Almpanis, T., & Joseph-Richard, P. (2022). Lecturing from home: Exploring academics’ experiences of remote teaching during a pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3(February), 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100133
An, J., & Thomas, N. (2021). Students’ beliefs about the role of interaction for science learning and language learning in EMI science classes: Evidence from high schools in China. Linguistics and Education, 65, 100972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100972
Bailey, D. R., Almusharraf, N., & Almusharraf, A. (2022). Video conferencing in the e ‑ learning context : explaining learning outcome with the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 7679–7698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10949-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10949-1
Benta, D., Bologa, G., & Dzitac, I. (2014). E-learning platforms in higher education. Case study. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 1170–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.373
Brooks, H. (1994). The relationship between science and technology. Research Policy, 23(5), 477–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01001-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01001-3
Çebi, A., & Güyer, T. (2020). Students’ interaction patterns in different online learning activities and their relationship with motivation, self-regulated learning strategy and learning performance. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10151-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10151-1
Dumrique, D. O., & Castillo, J. G. (2017). Online Gaming: Impact on the Academic Performance and Social Behavior of the Students in Polytechnic University of the Philippines Laboratory High School. KnE Social Sciences, 3(6), 1205–1210. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i6.2447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i6.2447
El-Soussi, A. (2022). The shift from face-to-face to online teaching due to COVID-19: Its impact on higher education faculty’s professional identity. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3(February), 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100139
Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., & Lencastre, J. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2
Grainger, R., Liu, Q., & Geertshuis, S. (2021). Learning technologies: A medium for the transformation of medical education? Medical Education, 55(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14261
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(May), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hsu, J. (2007). Innovative Technologies for Education and Learning. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 3(3), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.4018/jwltt.2008070106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jwltt.2008070106
Janíková, M., & Kowaliková, P. (2018). Technical Education in the Context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Tạp Chí Nghiên Cứu Dân Tộc, 23, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.25073/0866-773x/88 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25073/0866-773X/88
Le, V. T., Nguyen, N. H., Tran, T. L. N., Nguyen, L. T., Nguyen, T. A., & Nguyen, M. T. (2022). The interaction patterns of pandemic-initiated online teaching: How teachers adapted. System, 105(January), 102755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102755
Lee, J., Hong, N. L., & Ling, N. L. (2001). An analysis of students’ preparation for the virtual learning environment. Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00063-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00063-X
Lemay, D. J., Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2021). Transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100130
Lin, W. S., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit. Computers and Education, 58(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008
Lytras, M. D., Serban, A. C., Ruiz, M. J. T., Ntanos, S., & Sarirete, A. (2022). Translating knowledge into innovation capability: An exploratory study investigating the perceptions on distance learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic - the case of Mexico. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4), 100258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100258
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1(August), 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
Morrar, R., Husam, A., & Mousa, S. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0) a Social Innovation Perspective. Tạp Chí Nghiên Cứu Dân Tộc, 7(11), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.25073/0866-773x/97 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25073/0866-773X/97
Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101
Nácher, M. J., Badenes-Ribera, L., Torrijos, C., Ballesteros, M. A., & Cebadera, E. (2021). The effectiveness of the GoKoan e-learning platform in improving university students’ academic performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101026
Okabe-Miyamoto, K., Durnell, E., Howell, R. T., & Zizi, M. (2022). Video conferencing during emergency distance learning impacted student emotions during COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7, 100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100199
Patricia Aguilera-Hermida, A. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1(August), 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011
Prahmana, R. C. I., Hartanto, D., Kusumaningtyas, D. A., Ali, R. M., & Muchlas. (2021). Community radio-based blended learning model: A promising learning model in remote area during pandemic era. Heliyon, 7(7), e07511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07511
Rafique, G. M., Mahmood, K., Warraich, N. F., & Rehman, S. U. (2021). Readiness for Online Learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of Pakistani LIS students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102346
Raman, A., Sani, R. M., & Kaur, P. (2014). Facebook as a Collaborative and Communication Tool: A Study of Secondary School Students in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155(October), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.270
Ramly, Amrullah Abdh, Abd. Azis, (2022) Kinerja Akademik dalam Pelaksanaan Kuliah dalam Jaringan; Predisposisi Persepsional Mahasiswa di Kota Makassar, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Universitas Negeri Makassar hlm. 775-786 https://ojs.unm.ac.id/semnaslemlit/article/view/39680/18771
Reich, J. (2020). Online learning’s big issue. New Scientist, 248(3307), 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(20)31964-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(20)31964-3
Sagitova, R. (2014). Students’ Self-education: Learning to Learn Across the Lifespan. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152(843), 272–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.194
Selvaraj, A., Radhin, V., KA, N., Benson, N., & Mathew, A. J. (2021). Effect of pandemic based online education on teaching and learning system. International Journal of Educational Development, 85(May), 102444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102444
Seo, K., Dodson, S., Harandi, N. M., Roberson, N., Fels, S., & Roll, I. (2021). Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers and Education, 165(December 2019), 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132
Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., & Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre- and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115(August 2020), 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552
Siah, C. J. R., Huang, C. M., Poon, Y. S. R., & Koh, S. L. S. (2022). Nursing students’ perceptions of online learning and its impact on knowledge level. Nurse Education Today, 112, 105327. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEDT.2022.105327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105327
Sultoni, A., Priyatni, E. P., Nasih, A. M., Zahro, A., Juharyanto, & Ibrohim. (2021). Problems of online learning in a borderland of Indonesia in the COVID-19 pandemic. Community Empowerment through Research, Innovation and Open Access, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003189206-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003189206-14
Sumbawati, M. S., Munoto, Basuki, I., Ismayati, E., & Rijanto, T. (2020). Student Learning Independence in Online Learning Depends on Motivation. 196(Ijcse), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.201124.062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.201124.062
Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018). Industry 4.0 - A Glimpse. Procedia Manufacturing, 20, 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034
Vie, S. (2018). Effective Social Media Use in Online Writing Classes through Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Principles. Computers and Composition, 49, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.05.005
Wardoyo, C., Satrio, Y. D., Narmaditya, B. S., & Wibowo, A. (2021). Do technological knowledge and game-based learning promote students achievement: lesson from Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(11), e08467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08467
Wiemken, T. L., Furmanek, S. P., Mattingly, W. A., Haas, J., Ramirez, J. A., & Carrico, R. M. (2018). Googling your hand hygiene data: Using Google Forms, Google Sheets, and R to collect and automate analysis of hand hygiene compliance monitoring. American Journal of Infection Control, 46(6), 617–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2018.01.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2018.01.010
Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61(September), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006
Zulfikar, A. F., Muhidin, A., Pranoto, Suparta, W., Trisetyarso, A., Abbas, B. S., & Kang, C. H. (2019). The effectiveness of online learning with facilitation method. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.096
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
