Makna Simbolik dalam Folklor Nusantara: Studi Semiotika pada Tradisi Rudat di Daerah Karangasem-Bali

https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i2.5731

Authors

  • Muklina Faizah Universitas KH. Mukhtar Syafa'at
  • Moh. Syamsul Ma’arif Universitas KH. Mukhtar Syafa’at
  • Ali Manshur Universitas KH. Mukhtar Syafa’at

Keywords:

Tradisi, Rudat, tari tradisional, Semiotika,, Resensi budaya

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji peran tradisi Rudat di Karangasem, Bali, sebagai bentuk resistensi budaya terhadap globalisasi dan homogenisasi budaya. Rudat, seni tari tradisional bernuansa Islam, tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai hiburan tetapi juga sebagai simbol perlawanan terhadap dominasi budaya asing yang mengancam identitas lokal. Penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk mengungkap makna dibalik simbol-simbol tari tradisional yang jarang sekali mendapat perhatian halayak umum .  Menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan metode semiotika kultural, penelitian ini menganalisis data dari wawancara mendalam dengan tokoh masyarakat, pimpinan dan pemain Rudat, serta melalui observasi langsung dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa elemen-elemen dalam Rudat, seperti gerakan, musik, kostum, dan atribut, memiliki peran penting dalam menjaga nilai tradisional. Wawancara dengan tokoh seni dan masyarakat mengungkapkan bahwa Rudat tidak hanya memperkuat identitas komunitas Karangasem, tetapi juga menjadi alat perlawanan terhadap pengaruh budaya luar yang bertentangan dengan nilai-nilai lokal. Selain itu, Rudat berfungsi sebagai sarana edukasi dan sosialisasi nilai moral serta spiritual, yang membantu memperkuat kohesi sosial. Dengan demikian, Rudat bukan sekadar warisan budaya yang perlu dilestarikan, tetapi juga menjadi alat penting dalam mempertahankan identitas budaya lokal di tengah derasnya arus modernisasi dan globalisasi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Rauf, A. (2023). Purification in religious sojourns: consuming in relatively sacred spaces. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 26(2), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-04-2022-0068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-04-2022-0068

Abdullah, A. H., & Abdillah, N. (2021). Heritage value of the malayness socio-cultural symbols in millennium artist series of arts: A research analysis in semiotics. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 11(4), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2021-0093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2021-0093

Al Farisi, M. Z., Maulani, H., Hardoyo, A. B., Khalid, S. M., & Saleh, N. (2024). Investigating Arabic language teaching materials based on Indonesian folklore: an ethnographic study on the folktale of “Bandung.” Asian Education and Development Studies, 13(2), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2023-0082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2023-0082

Anto, R. P., Nur, N., Yusriani, Ardah, F. K., Ayu, J. D., Nurmahdi, A., Apriyeni, B. A. R., Purwanti, Adrianingsih, arita Y., & Putra, M. F. P. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori dan Penerapannya. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. (Vol. 2).

Asavei, M. A. (2021). On tradition and cultural memory in contemporary art: Theoretical considerations. Eidos: A Journal for Philosophy of Culture, 5(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2021.0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2021.0008

Bhat, R. M., Rajan, P., & Gamage, L. (2023). Redressing Historical Bias: Exploring the Path to an Accurate Representation of the Past. Journal of Social Science, 4(3), 698–705. https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v4i3.573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v4i3.573

Budoyo, S. R. (2021). International Journal of Culture and Art Studies. 05(1), 21–29.

Buschgens, M., Figueiredo, B., & Blijlevens, J. (2025). Heritage yet contemporary: an aesthetic cultural precept explaining diasporic consumer aesthetic appreciation for package design. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 34(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2023-4682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2023-4682

Callahan, C. (2020). Understanding Communication Through a Historical Lens. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.931

Cherian, B., & Article, O. (2024). From Text To Performance : A Bibliometric Literature ’ S Role In Performing Arts Exploration. 5, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.3288

Damayanti, V., Tohiroh, T., & Putra, D. A. K. (2023). Analisis Keterlambatan Berbicara Pada Anak Laki-Laki Kembar Usia Lima Tahun. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 8(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v8i2.18499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v8i2.18499

Gede Budarsa, & Ni Putu Ari Purwanti. (2024). Melihat Budaya Bali Dalam Spirit Islam: Inklusivisme Islam Pegayaman Sebagai Modal Pengembangan Wisata Budaya. Pusaka : Journal of Tourism, Hospitality, Travel and Business Event, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33649/pusaka.v3i1.76 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33649/pusaka.v3i1.76

Gutiérrez, M. C., Martín, R. L., Cruz, N. E., Gutiérrez, M. P., & Domínguez, O. A. (2023). Favoring Cultural Integration From an Education That Exceeds Sexism South–South Dialogue: Cuba, Argentina, and Peru in the Post-Pandemic Context. In M. E. V. Sáenz, L. A. C. Giraldo, M. S. Olmos, & G. N. R. Yepes (Eds.), Economy, Gender and Academy: A Pending Conversation (pp. 39–60). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-998-720231009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-998-720231009

HD, D. S., & Muttaqin, Z. (2020). The Representation of Sasak Society in the Text “Gugur Mayang.” Jurnal Humaniora, 32(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.27461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.27461

Khairunnisa, T., Studi, P., Tata, P., Indonesia, U. P., & Barat, J. (2024). Analisis makna simbolisme dan warna makhluk mitos mishepishu pada busana pesta malam wanita. 16(229), 88–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33153/brikolase.v16i1.5762

Koh, J. H., & Lim, C. M. (2023). Architectural language of the Southern Fujianese traditional Chinese temple timber frame structure in West Malaysia: a cultural semiotics analysis. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 17(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-12-2021-0351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-12-2021-0351

Laksono, Y. T. (2021). Communication and ritual on jaranan pogogan: The semiotics of performing arts. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 5(2), 493–508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v5i2.3061

Lestari, M. D., Ghufronudin, G., & Purwanto, D. (2023). Citra Diri Ekspresi Bertato: Studi Fenomenologi Pengguna Tato di “Kampung Pesilat” dalam Perspektif Cermin Diri. Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, Dan Humaniora, 7(2), 583. https://doi.org/10.31604/jim.v7i2.2023.583-591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31604/jim.v7i2.2023.583-591

Ma’arif, M. S., & Widadt, W. (2023). Analisis Makna Denotatif Dan Konotatif Berita Konflik Palestina Dan Israel Dalam Kabar Berita Harian Kompas.Com Edisi Mei 2021. Jurnal PENEROKA, 3(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.30739/peneroka.v3i1.1923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30739/peneroka.v3i1.1923

Martsidaun, C. S. (2024). Symbolic Meaning Of The Malangan Lembu Suro Mask From A Visual Semiotics Perspective Makna Simbolis Topeng Malangan Lembu Suro Dalam. 16(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.33153/brikolase.v16i2.6603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33153/brikolase.v16i2.6603

Mohzana, Hary Murcahyanto, & Faizin, A. (2022). Tari Rudat Anak Lembah Gunung Rinjani. Journal Ilmiah Rinjani : Media Informasi Ilmiah Universitas Gunung Rinjani, 10(2), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.53952/jir.v10i2.417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53952/jir.v10i2.417

Narwasty, M. A., Wiloso, P. G., & Sasongko, G. (2021). The symbolic meaning of Lulo dance: Tolaki tribe culture as communication medium. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 34(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v34i22021.159-172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V34I22021.159-172

Ngaopunii, T., Thomas, N., & Maske, S. (2024). From Tradition to Modernity: Unravelling the Transition of Indigenous Practices in Northeast India. https://doi.org/10.61841/V24I9/400368

Qadha, A. M. H., & Alward, M. A. (2020). The effect of using videos in teaching and learning English present progressive tense. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2019-0045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2019-0045

Sudarta. (2022). 済無No Title No Title No Title (Vol. 16, Issue 1).

Wahyono, W., & Hutahayan, B. (2020). Performance art strategy for tourism segmentation: (a Silat movement of Minangkabau ethnic group) in the event of tourism performance improvement. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(3), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-10-2017-0116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-10-2017-0116

Wang, X. (2023). Modern Textile Design Based on Traditional Elements. Frontiers in Art Research, 5(4), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.25236/far.2023.050409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/FAR.2023.050409

Yeni Handayani, Asep Wasta, & Wan Ridwan Husen. (2024). Analisis Kesenian Rudat “Gaya Cigadogan” di Kampung Cigadog Desa Cigadog Kecamatan Leuwisari. Imajinasi : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, Seni, Dan Teknologi, 1(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.62383/imajinasi.v1i2.188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62383/imajinasi.v1i2.188

Published

2025-05-02

How to Cite

Muklina Faizah, Moh. Syamsul Ma’arif, & Ali Manshur. (2025). Makna Simbolik dalam Folklor Nusantara: Studi Semiotika pada Tradisi Rudat di Daerah Karangasem-Bali. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 11(2), 2070–2083. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i2.5731

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories