Peningkatan Kemampuan Algebraic Thinking Siswa melalui Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL)

Authors

  • Laswadi Laswadi IAIN Kerinci

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v6i2.2587

Keywords:

Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL), Algebraic Thinking

Abstract

The algebraic thinking ability of junior high school students remains low. This condition is indicated by their limited understanding of story questions. Students lack practice in expressing what is known and asked in story problems. One of the causes of this low algebraic thinking ability is the use of inappropriate learning models or approaches. This research aims to apply the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach to enhance students' algebraic thinking skills. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach can improve students' algebraic thinking skills. The population of this study consists of 77 students from class VIII of MTsN 6 Kerinci. The research sample includes 38 students divided into two groups. The experimental research method is employed in this study. The results indicate that the N-Gain in the experimental group falls within the moderate range, namely 0.55, while the control group's N-Gain falls within the low range, specifically 0.26. The results of the hypothesis test demonstrate that the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach significantly improves students' algebraic thinking skills. Hence, it is recommended to implement the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach in current instruction to support the enhancement of students' algebraic thinking skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aqip, Z. (2013). Model-Model, Media, dan Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Inovatif). Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Astuti, D., & Ijudin, R. (2018). Kemampuan berpikir aljabar siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita ditinjau berdasarkan kemampuan matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 7(9), 1–8.

Girit, D., & Akyuz, D. (2017). Investigating Teaching Practices for Algebraic Expressions within A Multiple Case Study. The EuroAsia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 2017, 6, 31–37.

Halin, H. (2018). Pengaruh Kualitas Produk Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Semen Baturaja di Palembang pada PT Semen Baturaja (Persero) Tbk. Jemg; Jurnal Ecoment Global, 3(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.35908/jeg.v3i2.477.

Husna, L. Al, Mz, Z. A., & Vebrianto, R. (2021). Studi Eksploratif Problematika Pembelajaran Matematika Di Sekolah Dasar Di Tanah Datar Explorative Study Of Problematics Learning Mathematics In Basic Schools In Tanah Datar. Mathline Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v6i1.159.

Laswadi, Kusumah, Y. S., Darwis, S., & Afgani, J. D. (2016). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural fluency for junior high school students through model-facilitated learning (MFL). European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9454.

Mega Herlinda, Aripin, N. S. (2020). Proses Berpikir Kritis dan Kesalahan Peserta Didik dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Dominance-Influence. Mathline Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v5i2.161.

Nismalasari, Santiani, & Rohmadi, M. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Getaran Harmonis. EduSains : Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematika, 4(2), 74–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v4i2.511.

Paridjo. (2018). Kemampuan Berpikir Aljabar Mahasiswa dalam Materi Trigonometri Ditinjau dari Latar Belakang Sekolah Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 814–829.

Resi, S. La, Samparadja, H., & Masuha, J. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Aljabar Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika pada Siswa Kelas VII MTs Negeri 2 Kendari. Jurnal Penelitian Pendididikan Matematika, 7(2), 29–42. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.36709/jppm.v7i2.8267.

Sari, N. P. N., Fuad, Y., & Ekawati, R. (2020). Profil Berpikir Aljabar Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Pola Bilangan. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 11(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v11i1.22525.

Sihabudin, S., & Toheri, T. (2013). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Aljabar Mahasiswa Semester IV Tahun Ajaran 2011 – 2012 IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v2i2.42.

Silma, U. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Aljabar Siswa dalam Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(3), 300–319.

Sudjana. (2005). Metoda Statistika (Keenam). Bandung: Tarsito.

Sulastri, A. (2016). Penerapan Pendekatan Kontekstual Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpgsd.v1i1.9068.

Yustina, Rustiyarso, & Rosnita. (2013). Peningkatan motivasi pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan pendekatan Contextual Teaching Learning pada Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 2(1).

Zulfayanto, I., Lestari, S., Ilmiah, T., Malang, U. I., & Malang, K. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Himpunan Siswa SMP Kelas VII Ditinjau Dari Gender Analysis Of Errors In Resolving Set Problems Of Junior Junior High School Student Class VII Reviewed From Gender. Mathline Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v6i1.172.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-25

How to Cite

Laswadi, L. (2023). Peningkatan Kemampuan Algebraic Thinking Siswa melalui Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL). Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v6i2.2587