Selection Of The Most Favorite Mineral Water Among Students Using The Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method

Authors

  • Indra Willy Juliansya Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Hendra Cipta Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v8i1.5519

Keywords:

Selection of Mineral Water,, Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method, Favorite Brands,, Students

Abstract

Mineral water is a type of water that contains natural minerals or other dissolved substances that can provide taste and health benefits. However, the selection of the most favorite mineral water among students is still not accurate. This is what makes the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method as data processing as the selection of the most favourite mineral water and generates a ranking of the weight calculation of the mineral water selection. The SAW method is used to solve qualitative problems in the selection of mineral water, comparing one criterion to another in order to assess each brand of mineral water in the UINSU Tuntungan area and provide the results of the selection of the most favourite mineral water. This study used 100 student data, 5 brands of mineral water, and 6 criteria, namely price, taste, packaging, water quality, brand, and availability. After determining the weight value of each attribute using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), each alternative is chosen using ranking. This technique facilitates decision-making and yields the optimum outcome. When it comes to selecting mineral water, the findings of this study offer the finest option.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ades Galih Anto, Hindayanti Mustafidah, Aman Suyadi (2015) “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting),” di Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
Setiadi, A., Yunita., Ningsh, A.R., " Penerapan metode Simple Additive weighting (SAW) untuk Pemilihan Siswa Terbaik," Jurnal Sisfokom, Vol. 7 No.2, pp. 104-109, 2018.
Cotruvo J., Bartram JE “Kalsium dan Magnesium dalam Air Minum WHO”. Jenewa, Swiss: 2009.
G. B. Subawa, I. M. A. Wirawan, and I. M. G. Sunarya, “Pemilihan Pegawai Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Di Pt Tirta Jaya Abadi Singaraja”, Jurnal KARMAPATI Vol. 4 No.5, 2015.
EL Ruskan., Ibrahim A., & H Dwi Citra. “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Hotel Di Kota Palembang Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW).” Jurnal Sistem Informasi 5(1):546–65. 2013.
Yaqien, Lubbuy. 2014. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Karyawan Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Mamdani. Skripsi. Malang: Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim. Jurnal.
S. Eniyati. “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan Untuk Penerimaan Beasiswa Dengan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting).” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi DINAMIK 16(2):171–76. 2011.
Kadir, Abdul. (2009). “Mastering Ajax dan PHP”. Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher.
Dedi, winda noviana (2013). “Rancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Teladan dengan Menngunakan Metode SAW.” Hamzah Denny Subagyo, Ariyani dan Hersa Farida Qoriani (2017). “Analisa Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Universitas Narotama Dengan Metode SAW Berbasis Android,”.
T. Limbong, Tonni dkk. 2020. “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode dan Im-plementasi”. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis
Kusrini. 2007. “Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan,”. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Sugiyono. 2013. “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D “. Bandung Alfabet.
Kusumadewi, Sri dkk. 2006. “Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM).” Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Kusrini. 2007.” Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan.” Yogyakarta: Andi
Pahlevy, Randy, Tesar. 2010. “Rancang Bangun Sistem pendukung Keputusan Menentukan

Downloads

Published

2025-02-25

How to Cite

Indra Willy Juliansya, & Hendra Cipta. (2025). Selection Of The Most Favorite Mineral Water Among Students Using The Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v8i1.5519