Comparing The Effectiveness of Mind Mapping and Summarizing in Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes in Flipped Classroom Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.8.1.2025.5552Keywords:
Flipped Classroom, Mind Mapping, Summarizing, Learning Outcomes, Instructional StrategiesAbstract
The urgency of this research lies in the need to explore and compare the effectiveness of two distinct teaching strategies, mind mapping and summarizing, within the flipped classroom model, considering the challenges in determining the most effective method to enhance student learning outcomes across various disciplines, as well as understanding factors that may influence learning success, such as student engagement and material quality. This study examines the effectiveness of the flipped classroom model in enhancing students' learning outcomes, focusing on two distinct instructional strategies: mind mapping and summarizing. Using a posttest-only control group design, the research compared two groups: Class A (mind mapping) and Class B (summarizing), each consisting of 20 fifth-semester chemistry education students. Students engaged with materials independently before class and presented their understanding using their respective methods. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, Levene's test for homogeneity of variances, and the Mann-Whitney U test for comparing post-test scores. The results showed that Class A followed a normal distribution (p > 0.05), whereas Class B did not meet the normality assumption (p < 0.05). However, the Levene's test indicated homogeneity of variances between the groups (p > 0.05). The Mann-Whitney U test revealed no statistically significant difference in post-test scores (U = 156.5, p = 0.244), with mean scores of 86.83 for Class A and 86.42 for Class B. Effect size analysis using Cohen's d demonstrated a negligible effect (d = 0.06), suggesting equivalent effectiveness between the two methods. These findings highlight that both mind mapping and summarizing are equally effective within the flipped classroom model, reinforcing its versatility in diverse learning contexts. Future research is recommended to explore additional factors, such as student engagement and material quality, that may influence learning outcomes in this instructional model.
Downloads
References
Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). A Strategic Approach to Onsite Learning in the Era of SARS-Cov-2. In Sn Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00664
Alrehaili, N. A., Aslam, M. A., Alahmadi, D., Alrehaili, D. A., Asif, M., & Malik, M. S. A. (2021). Ontology-Based Smart System to Automate Higher Education Activities. In Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5588381
Belmahdi, A., Li, J., & Muirhead, B. (2022). Youth English Language Learners’ Learning Outcomes and Experiences of Digital Technology-Based Writing Instruction: A Literature Review of Key Empirical Evidence. Journal of Digital Life and Learning, 2(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.51357/jdll.v2i1.166
Candel, M. J. J. M. (2018). Efficient Design of Cluster Randomized Trials With Treatment‐dependent Costs and Treatment‐dependent Unknown Variances. In Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7824
Chan, C. K. Y., Kwong, T., Chan, Y. B., Ko, A. W. Y., & Tse, S. S.-K. (2024). What Employers Really Want: A deep Dive Into Résumés and Holistic Competencies. In Education + Training. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-06-2023-0252
Chmarkh, M. (2021). ‘Writing to Learn’ Research: A Synthesis of Empirical Studies (2004-2019). European Journal of Educational Research, volume-10-2021(volume-10-issue-1-january-2021), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.85
Cho, M., & Kim, M. Y. (2019). Outcomes and influential factors applying flipped learning methods in a clinical adult nursing practicum. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12724
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
Gopi Krishna, A. K., Koursar Basha, P., Yadav, S., & Kiran Kumar Reddy, G. (2024). Assessment on recruiters judgements in the summarizings of engineering students in campus recruitment. Journal of Management Research and Analysis, 11(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jmra.2024.018
Honea, H., Castro, I. A., & Peter, P. C. (2017). Evidence Items as Signals of Marketing Competencies and Workplace Readiness: A Practitioner Perspective. In Journal of Marketing Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475317724845
Ismail, A. (2022). Remote Teaching and Learning During COVID-19 “Lockdown” Period in Malaysia: One Institution’s Experience. In Iium Journal of Orofacial and Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijohs.v3i1.132
Ismail, A., Ismail, N. H., Kassim, N. Y. M. A., Lestari, W., Ismail, A. F., & Sukotjo, C. (2021). Knowledge, Perceived Risk, and Preventive Behaviors Amidst Covid-19 Pandemic Among Dental Students in Malaysia. In Dentistry Journal. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9120151
Jama, I., & Alnefaie, M. (2022). The Impact of Providing Instructions to EFL Learners by Analyzing their Professional Summarizing. International Journal of English La nguage and Literature Studies, 11(4), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v11i4.4672
Juul, S. J., Rossetti, S., Kicinski, M., van der Kaaij, M. A., Giusti, F., Meijnders, P., ... & Maraldo, M. V. (2023). Work and education interruption in long-term Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: an analysis among patients from nine EORTC-LYSA trials. Acta Oncologica, 62(7), 744-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2195561
Kayaalp, F., Meral, E., & Başçı Namlı, Z. (2021). I Wrote, I Was Evaluated, And I Learned An Alternative Teaching Process In Distance Education: Writing-To-Learn. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews. https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V10.N3.07
Man, F. L. C., He, H. H., & Cheung, S. K. (2020). Rational Choice, Personal Norms, Social Norms and Intention to Commit Summarizing Fraud. International Journal of Social Science Research, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v9i1.17812
McKeown, J. S., & Bergman-Ray, C. (2023). COVID-19 and US Higher Education: Impact on Student Mobility. In Creative Education. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.144056
Mekonnen, B. D. (2020). Factors Associated With Early Resumption of Sexual Intercourse Among Women During Extended Postpartum Period in Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross Sectional Study. In Contraception and Reproductive Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-020-00124-7
Mitra, A. R., Samosir, F. V. P., Hudi, R., & Tarigan, R. E. (2023). From Tradition to Innovation: Mind Map Generation in Higher Education. In Ultima Infosys Jurnal Ilmu Sistem Informasi. https://doi.org/10.31937/si.v14i2.3432
Nhat, T. N. M., & Le, T. Van. (2023). Effects of Reflective Thinking On Deep Learning in Theoretical Linguistics Classes. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1647a
Noyan, E., & Kocoglu, Z. (2019). Developing EFL Writing Skills through WhatsApp Dialogue Journaling. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.2p.38
Ogunjimi, M. O., & Gbadeyanka, T. A. (2022). Effect of Guided Inquiry and Explicit-Instructional Strategies on Lower Basic Students’ Academic Performance in Mathematics. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 3(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijotis.v3i1.54191
Pallikadavath, S., Rajan, S. I., & Wilson, C. (2016). Impact of Low Fertility and Early Age at Sterilisation on Women’s Formal Education and Skill Development in South India. In Journal of Population Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-016-9167-y
Pina, A., Petersheim, C., Cherian, J., Lahey, J., Alexander, G. M., & Hammond, T. (2023). Using Machine Learning With Eye-Tracking Data to Predict if a Recruiter Will Approve a Summarizing. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction. https://doi.org/10.3390/make5030038
Purwanti, I. T., Suryawati, E., & Eliwarti, E. (2022). Video Lectures in Online EFL Flipped-Classroom: Effectiveness, Students’ Evaluation and Experiences. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-11-2022(volume-11-issue-2-april-2022), 885–898. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.885
Rindengan, M. M., & Rindengan, M. (2019, December). Scaffolding Model in Learning of Writing of Essays, Based on Experience. In 5th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2019) (pp. 220-224). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icet-19.2019.56
Risavy, S. D., Robie, C., Fisher, P. A., & Rasheed, S. (2022). Summarizings vs. Application Forms: Why the Stubborn Reliance on Summarizings? In Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884205
Sinaga, P., & Feranie, S. (2017). Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills and Writing Skills through the Variation in Non-Traditional Writing Task. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1025a
Stokhof, H., Vries, B. de, Bastiaens, T., & Martens, R. (2018). Using Mind Maps to Make Student Questioning Effective: Learning Outcomes of a Principle-Based Scenario for Teacher Guidance. In Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9686-3
Tan, E., Brainard, A., & Larkin, G. L. (2015). Acceptability of the flipped classroom approach for in‐house teaching in emergency medicine. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 27(5), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12454
Vasylkivska, N., & Rostykus, N. (2023). The Use of Mind Maps in Primary School. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3605.23.2.4
Vliet, E. A. van, Winnips, J. C., & Brouwer, N. (2015). Flipped-Class Pedagogy Enhances Student Metacognition and Collaborative-Learning Strategies in Higher Education but Effect Does Not Persist. In Cbe—life Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-09-0141
Wannas, A. S., Hassan, I. H., & Mohsen, M. M. A. (2022). Effects of Mind Mapping on Learning ESP Vocabulary: A Case Study. In Insights Into Language Culture and Communication. https://doi.org/10.21622/467
Ying, Y. S., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2022). The Impact of Flipped Classroom Instructional Model in Teaching English as a Second Language (ESL) Among Lower Secondary Pupils. In International Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v14i4.20559
Zhang, F., Wang, H., Zhang, H., & Sun, Q. (2024). The Landscape of Flipped Classroom Research: A Bibliometrics Analysis. In Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1165547
Zhou, X., Li, W., & Dai, H. (2023). Application of the 3-Step Mind Map Approach in Senior High School English Reading Teaching. In Journal of Language Teaching and Research. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1406.34
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with JSGP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
