Landasan Filosofis Postmodern dalam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kontemporer

Authors

  • Fathurrahman Fathurrahman Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Sariyatun Sariyatun Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Heri Susanto Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.8.3.2025.6570

Keywords:

Filosofis Postmodern, Pengembangan, Model Pembelajaran, Kontemporer

Abstract

Contemporary education faces complex challenges in responding to increasingly diverse social realities, where traditional modern paradigms emphasizing objectivity, linearity, and single rationality are beginning to be questioned for their effectiveness. The urgency of educational transformation is becoming increasingly pressing in light of developments in digital technology, globalization, and the post-truth era, which demand learning approaches that are more adaptive, inclusive, and responsive to the complexities of the times. This study aims to explore the postmodern philosophical foundations as a basis for developing innovative learning models that reject universal rationality and accommodate plurality of perspectives. The research uses a literature review approach by analyzing twelve relevant scientific articles published between 2020 and 2025 from accredited national and international journals. The selection process includes articles that have undergone peer review, are available in full text, and are relevant to postmodern philosophy, learning innovation, and 21st-century education. Data analysis was conducted through in-depth reading, thematic identification, comparison, and synthesis of information. The findings reveal that postmodern educational philosophy emphasizes pluralism, criticism of grand narratives, and curriculum decentralization as the foundation for more inclusive learning. The main themes identified include paradigmatic transformation requiring decentralization of pedagogical processes, integration of humanistic technology through adaptive digital learning, innovative methodologies emphasizing subjectivity and creativity, adaptive strategies responsive to technological changes, and development of authentic identity through intrinsically motivated and reflective learning. The research concludes that the development of contemporary learning models must integrate philosophical, technological, methodological, strategic, and psychological aspects within a holistic framework that transforms education from rigid knowledge transfer into a space for the liberation of meaning that values diversity and context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, S., Umirzakova, S., Mujtaba, G., Amin, M. S., & Whangbo, T. (2023). Education 5.0: Requirements, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2307.15846, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.15846

Baykent, U. Ö. (2025). Postmodern Pedagogy: Rewriting The Rules of Learning and Teaching. Conhecimento & Diversidade, 17(45), 394–410.

Bulankina, N., Malahova, N., Egorova, E., Seredintseva, A., & Tsybaneva, V. (2020). Dominant values of professional development education spaces of cross-border regions in the aspect of postmodernism. E3S Web of Conferences, 210. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021022017

Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (2021). Education for a “Post-Truth” World: New Directions for Research and Practice. Educational Researcher, 50(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20940683

Djazilan, M. S. (2019). Relevansi sistem pendidikan pesantren tradisional dalam era modernisasi. Jurnal Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 5(1), 89-106.

Glassman, M., Tilak, S., & Kang, M. J. (2023). Transcending post-truth: Open educational practices in the information age. Distance Education, 44(4), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2267468

Haidamaka, O., Kolisnyk-Humeniuk, Y., Storizhko, L., Marchenko, T., Poluboiaryna, I., & Bilova, N. (2022). Innovative Teaching Technologies in Postmodern Education: Foreign and Domestic Experience. Postmodern Openings, 13(1 Sup1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1sup1/419

Hashim, M. A. M., Tlemsani, I., Matthews, R., Mason-Jones, R., & Ndrecaj, V. (2022). Emergent Strategy in Higher Education: Postmodern Digital and the Future? Administrative Sciences, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040196

Khabib, M. A., Risdiyanto, H., Rambas, J. D., Romlah, R., Arifin, Z., & Rohman, S. (2024). Penerapan Pendekatan Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Organisasi Pendidikan Islam. DIMAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 120-139. https://doi.org/10.58577/dimar.v6i1.318

Mansur, H., Utama, A. H., Mohd Yasin, M. H., Sari, N. P., Jamaludin, K. A., & Pinandhita, F. (2023). Development of Inclusive Education Learning Design in the Era of Society 5.0. Social Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010035

Mudzakkir, A., Naro, W., & Yahdi, M. (2024). Sejarah pendidikan Islam: Karakter pendidikan Islam klasik & modern. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Educational Review, 1(3), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.58230/ijier.v1i3.268

Nally, D. (2024). A democratic curriculum for the challenges of post-truth. Curriculum Perspectives, 44(2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-024-00228-z

Nasir, M., Assya’bani, R., Noor, I., & Iqbal, M. (2024). The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology Postmodernism Educational Philosophy (Curriculum Review, Learning Methods And The Role Of Teachers). IJEMS The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology, 3(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/DOI:10.58818/ijems.v3i2.16

Pohrebniak, D., Bolotnykova, T., Farionov, V., Tomich, L., Beseda, N., & Anastasova, O. (2022). Innovative Technologies in Physical Education: Adapting to a Postmodern Society. Postmodern Openings, 13(4), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.4/516

Putri, T. D., Haq, Z., & Gusmaneli, G. (2025). Model Pembelajaran Tradisional Dan Kontemporer Dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam. Lencana: Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 304-312. https://doi.org/10.55606/lencana.v3i1.4579

Rostoka, M., Cherevychnyi, G., Luchaninova, O., & Pyzhyk, A. (2022). Philosophical and Pedagogical Discourse in the Postmodern Educational Space: Peculiarities of Distance Learning. Postmodern Openings, 13(4), 244–272. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.4/517

Ulianova, V., Tkachova, N., Tkachov, S., Gavrysh, I., & Khltobina, O. (2022). Changing the Paradigm of Education in Postmodern Times. Postmodern Openings, 13(1), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1/404

Vernon, Z., & Paz, A. (2023). Creative Authenticity: A Framework for Supporting the Student Self in Design Education. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 42(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12428

Woodward, A. (2023). Postinformational Education. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 31(4), 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2023.2290548

Yuskovych-Zhukovska, V., Bogut, O., Lotyuk, Y., Kravchuck, O., Rudenko, O., & Vasylenko, H. (2022). E-Learning in a Postmodern Society. Postmodern Openings, 13(1 Sup1), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1sup1/435

Zuairiyah, Z., Tsaniyah, R. I., Hidayah, N., Saputri, I. A., Sahara, M. L., & Achmad, S. (2025). Rekonstruksi Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam Adaptif: Integrasi Tauhid, Teknologi dan Sains untuk Mewujudkan Generasi Qur’ani Modern. Journal of Instructional and Development Researches, 5(4), 370-383.https://doi.org/10.53621/jider.v5i4.554

Published

2025-11-03

How to Cite

Fathurrahman, F., Sariyatun, S., & Susanto, H. (2025). Landasan Filosofis Postmodern dalam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kontemporer. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 8(3), 1705–1716. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.8.3.2025.6570

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.