Keefektifan Pembelajaran Menuliskan Kembali Cerita Fantasi Bermuatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila dengan Model Think Talk Write dan Model Quantum Teaching Berbantuan Media Audio Visual pada Siswa Kelas VII
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i3.6037
Keywords:
cerita fantasi, model think talk write, model quantum teachingAbstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan perbedaan keefektifan menuliskan Kembali cerita fantasi bermuatan profil Pelajar Pancasila dengan model Think Talk Write dan model Quantum Teaching berbantuan media audio visual pada siswa kelas VII. Penelitian ini menggunakan motode pre-experimental dengan menggunakan two gruup ptetest-posttest design. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Sampel penelititian ini adalah siswa kelas VII MTs Negeri 2 Ogan Ilir Tahun Ajaran 2024/2025. Perbedaan keefektifan model Think Talk Write dan model Quantum Teaching bisa dilihat dari pengujian independent t-test dan uji anova. Hasil uji independent t-test Pretest pada data kelas eksperimen 1 dan kelas eksperimen 2 dengan menggunakan SPSS 25 adalah nilai signifikansi 0,920 > 0,5, maka data tersebut menunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan rata-rata pada kedua kelas eksperimen sebelum diberi perlakuan. Kelas eksperimen 1 nilai rata-ratanya sebesar 64,21 dan kelas eksperimen 2 nilai rata-ratanya sebesar 64,40. Hasil uji independent t-test Posttest pada data kelas eksperimen 1 dan kelas eksperimen 2 dengan menggunakan SPSS 25 adalah nilai signifikansi 0,014 < 0,5, maka data tersebut menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan rata-rata yang signifikan pada hasil posttest siswa kelas eksperimen 1 dan 2. Kelas eksperimen 1 nilai rata-ratanya sebesar 83,75 dan kelas eksperimen 2 nilai rata-ratanya sebesar 87,15. Hasil uji anova menunjukkan 0,026 < 0,05 berarti terdapat perbedaan keefektifan antara pembelajaran menuliskan kembali cerita fantasi menggunakan model Think Talk Write dengan pembelajaran menuliskan kembali cerita fantasi menggunakan model Quantum Teaching berbantuan media audio visual pada siswa kelas VII. Berdasrkan hasil uji output descriptive data kelas eksperimen 1 dan 2, nilai rata-rata siswa kelas eksperimen 1 adalah sebesar 83,75 dan nilai rata-rata siswa kelas eksperimen 2 adalah sebesar 87,16. Data tersebut menu jukkan bahwa pembelajaran menuliskan cerita fantasi dengan model Quantum Teaching lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan model Think Talk Write.
Downloads
References
Amanah. (2023). “Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Teks Fantasi Melalui Model Pembelajaran Quantum Teaching”. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan 5 (3).
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
A’la, Miftahul. (2012). Quantum Teaching (Buku Pintar dan Praktis). Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.
Azizinezhad, M., Hashemi, M., & Darvishi, S. (2013). “Application of cooperative learning in EFL classes to enhance the students’ language learning”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, (13), 138-141.
Badan Standar Kurikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan. (2024). Kajian Akademik Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran.
Celik, S., & Aytin, K.B.E. (2013). “Implementing cooperative learning in the language classroom: opinions of Turkish teachers of English”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, (70), 1852 – 1859.
Cunningham, A.J., Baikousi, V., Eyre, V., Duncan, M., Crotti, M., Martins, R., & Wood, C. (2025). “A movement and story-telling intervention improves language and fundamental movement skills and is feasible for delivery by teachers in the f irst year of school”. Learning and Instruction, 97, 102110.
Ellis, Susan. (2003).” Story-writing, planning and creativity”. Reading Literacy and Language, 27-31.
Gal, C., & Ryder, C.H. (2025). “Unlocking Potential: Comparing collaborative and Traditional Learning Methods for Students with Learning Disabilities in Special Education Classrooms”. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 101521.
Gao, Fei. (2013). “A case study of using a social annotation tool to support collaboratively learning“. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 76-83.
Hamzah, A., dan Muhlisrarini. (2003). Perencanaan Dan Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada,
Istiqomah, E.A., Nuryatin, A., & Wagiran. (2020). “Retelling Fantasy Story Text Learning with Creative Productive Model based On Learning Styles of Seventh Graders”. Seloka: Indonesian Language and Education Journal, 9 (1), 53-59.
Jin, F., & Lin, C.H., Lai, C. (2025). “Modeling AI-assisted writing: How self-regulated learning influences writing outcomes”. Computers in Human Behavior, 165, 108538.
Kalantari, S., Rubegni, E., Benton, L., & Vasalou, A. (2023). “When I’m writing a story, I am really good” Exploring the use of digital storytelling technology at home”. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 38, 100613.
Muhsin, Busyairi, Lalu, dkk. (2024). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Think Talk Write (TTW). Banyumas: Wawasan Ilmu.
Mustakim, A., Wawan., Choirudin., Ngaliyah, J., Darmayanti, R. (2023). Quantum Teaching Model: Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa MTs. Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. 1 (1) 6-10.
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. (2001). Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
O’dell, Kaylin. (2020). “Modern Marginalia: Using Digital Annotation in the Composition Classroom“. Computers and Composition, 56, 102570.
Rong, J., Deng, Y., & Liu, D. (2025). “The effects of incorporating mindset intervention in L2 English writing on Chinese college EFL students’ learning engagement and writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 68, 101193.
Sari, N.S., & Wisudariani, N.M.R. (2023). “Penerapan Media Film untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menceritakan Kembali Isi Cerita Fantasi Siswa Kelas VII”. Jurnal Ilmiah Tri Hita Karana. 1 (1) 1-9.
Seçer, Ş., Şahin, M., & Alc, B. (2015). “Investigating The Effect Of Audio Visual Materials As Warm-up Activity In Aviation English Courses On Students’ Motivation And Participation At High School Level”. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 199 120-128.
Shen, X., Ismail, L., Jeyaraj, J.J., & Teng, M.F. (2024). “Metacognitive strategies, writing self-efficacy and writing anxiety in different learning modes: A two-wave longitudinal model”. System, 126, 103485.
Sugiyono (2013): Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Zheng, Y.D., Stewart, N. (2024). “Improving EFL students’ cultural awareness: Reframing moral dilemmatic stories with ChatGPT”. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6 100223.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
