About the Journal
Focus and Scope
The aim of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics related mathematics learning.
The published articles are open submission, indexed and peer-reviewed
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Plagiarism Check
The editor will run a plagiarism check using Crossref Similarity Check powered by turnitin for the submitted articles before sending it to the reviewers. If an evaluates has an unfair number of similarities based on the result of the check, we will send back the article to the author to be revised.
Peer Review Process
Every submitted article will be independently reviewed. The decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon reports/recommendation. After being reviewed, there will be three kinds of editor decision based on reviewers’ recommendation: 1) Accept Submission with No Revision; 2) Accept Submission with Revisions; or 3) Decline/Reject Submission.
Article Processing Charge (APCs)
We need resources (editors, reviewers, web maintenance, galley editors, etc) to work better, effective, and efficient in managing this journal. In this case, we do not have funding support. For that reason, we will charge the authors for each accepted article. The APC is IDR 400,000 which includes: 1) Publishing Fee; 2) a copy of printed journal; 3) Similarity Check; 4) DOI Content Registration, and 5) Web Maintenance. The payment method will be informed by the editors after the publication.
Retraction
The papers published in JSGP will be considered for retraction from the publication if: (1) they have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error); (2) the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission, or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication); (3) it constitutes plagiarism; and/or (4) it reports unethical research. The mechanism of retraction follows the Retraction Guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).