Deskripsi Kesalahan Pengoperasian Bentuk Aljabar Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Auditorial

Authors

  • Abdurrahman Hamid Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Asmaun Asmaun Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Muhammad Syarifuddin Rahman Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v8i2.5590

Keywords:

Misconception, algebraic, auditorial learning style, CRI

Abstract

The present research is a descriptive study employing a qualitative technique, aimed at elucidating the misconceptions regarding the operation of algebraic expressions based on auditory learning styles. This study aims to discover and examine the misconceptions encountered by students with auditory learning styles in comprehending mathematical ideas. The participants in this study were eighth-grade students from class VIII-A of a junior high school with an auditory learning style. The data's validity in this study was established by temporal triangulation procedures to assure the consistency and reliability of the findings. The study utilized a learning style assessment to evaluate students' preferences and a concept comprehension test using a Confidence Rating Index (CRI) to thoroughly identify students' misconceptions.

The study's results showed that the research subjects coded YTA experienced various misconceptions about classifying objects according to certain properties according to their concepts, simplifying algebraic forms in various forms of mathematical representation, using and utilizing and selecting certain procedures or operations, and applying concepts or algorithms in problem solving. In addition, the subjects also experienced obstacles in applying concepts or algorithms to solve mathematical problems systematically.

According to these findings, students' conceptual understanding of algebraic topics may be influenced by their auditory learning styles, particularly when integrating auditory representations with symbolic notions. Consequently, enhanced adaptive learning tactics are required, including the utilization of audio media to assist students with auditorial learning preferences in comprehending mathematical concepts more effectively and reducing the likelihood of misconceptions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afriadi, J. (2019). Identifikasi Kesalahan dan Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika Pada Topik SPLDV. Math Educa Journal, 2(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.15548/mej.v2i2.191

Afrianti, D. (2020). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Tema Hemat Energi melalui Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share (TPS). Pendidik Anak Cerdas Dan Pintar, 4(2), 79–85.

Agung Herutomo, R., & Mulyono Saputro, T. E. (2014). Analisis Kesalahan Dan Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas Viii Pada Materi Aljabar. Edusentris, 1(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.17509/edusentris.v1i2.140

Arumsari, D. M. (2023). Analisis Gaya Belajar Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Ipas. LEARNING : Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v3i1.2118

Fitriyani, D., Rahmawati, Y., & Yusmaniar, Y. (2019). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Pembelajaran Larutan Elektrolit dan Non-Elektrolit dengan 8E Learning Cycle. JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 9(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpk.091.04

Gunawan, A. W. (2007). Genius Learning Strategy. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Hamid, A. (2024). Kognitif. Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pada Materi Ekponen Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif, X, 472 – 482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i1.1539

Hamzah B. Uno. (2010). Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pembelajaran. PT. Bumi Aksara.

Napu, T. W., Lubur, D. N. L., & Nambers, D. S. (2024). Analisi Proses Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif-Diskursif Menggunakan Sistem Kategori. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v4i1.1285

Nurlaili, E. . (2012). ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 16 SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2011/2012 PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MATERI POKOK SEGITIGA. In Digilib.uns.ac.id (Ed.), perpustakaan.uns.ac.id. perpustakaan.uns.ac.id.

Ozkan, E. M., & Ozkan, A. (2012). Misconception in Exponential Numbers in IST and IIND Level Primary School Mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.069

Parwati, S. (2024). Analisi Gaya Belajar Visual, Ouditori dan Kinestetik Dalam Pengembangan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Al-Qur’an Hadist Kelas VII Madrasah Tsanawiyah Al-Ikhwan Sesait, Kecamatan Kayangan Kabupaten Lombok Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(3), 2098–2103. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i3.2655

Rahmawati, L., & Gumiandari, S. (2021). Identifikasi Gaya Belajar (Visual, Auditorial Dan Kinestetik) Mahasiswa Tadris Bahasa Inggris Kelas 3F IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Pedagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.33084/pedagogik.v16i1.1876

Sapriyanto. (2018). Deskripsi Kemampuan Pemahaman Konseptual Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Segiempat Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa SMP Negeri 1 Bissappu. Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Saputra, D. N., Ariningsih, K. A., Wau, M. P., Noviyani, R., Awe, E. Y., & Firdausiyah, L. (2021). Pengantar Pendidikan. In CV. Pustaka Learning Center (Issue December).

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. In Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D (p. 329). Elfabeta.

Tanjung, R., Wulandari, F., Rakeyan Santang, S., Kunci, K., Belajar Siswa, H., Bangun Ruang, K., & Inquiri, M. (2023). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Tentang Konsep Bangun Ruang Dengan Menggunakan Metode Inquiri. Jurnal Primary Edu (JPE), 1(1), 83–98.

Windura, S. (2017). Be An Absolute Genius. Gramedia.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-30

How to Cite

Hamid, A., Asmaun, A., & Rahman, M. S. (2025). Deskripsi Kesalahan Pengoperasian Bentuk Aljabar Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Auditorial. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v8i2.5590

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Innovasi dalam Matematika dan Pembelajarannya

Section

Articles

License

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.